Saturday, November 28, 2015

New demanding the resignation of the government of Democratic Madhesi Front failed to bet :: Watch Video

Madhesh-centric protesting parties have blamed the government to be failure as the ongoing problem could not be solved even after the completion of 105 days. They have started saying that they should search an alternative of the government as the government is unable to address the need of Terai Madhesh though more than 50 people have died during the movement. There should be alternatives of the government as the ruling government is pacing against the democracy and the system. “This government is neither democratic not welfare, so is not solving the problem; and is troubling the public. So what I appeal is the public should come on the road protesting against the government, which is irresponsible to the public.” Says Sadhbhawana Party Co-President Laxmanlal Karna. Karna adds, “The government should think to solve the problem, else, quit the position for the capable one who can solve it.” The agitating forum as raised the voice that Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli, even after one and half months of his tenure, has continued dialoguing instead of solving the ongoing problem. The Forum leaders have claimed that the government is playing to save the position instead of solving the problem. “Declare and do the war, go to the border, else, escape from the post.” Says Federalism Socialist Forum President Upendra Yadav. Madheshi forum, which is being involved the in the movement since Shrawan 31st, has demanded for two states at Terai; proportionate electorate system; so and so. After the movement of the forum, Shushil Koirala led government, with the consent of the three major parties, had decided to address all the demands except two Terai States; and had registered the two pints for the amendment is the newly made constitution. Though present government is ready to address those demands; however, the forum leaders, saying the two-states is their bottom line demand, have clearly expressed that they would dialogue for other demands only after the demarcation of boundary. So it is unclear when the dialogue will put the solution.